Based on the condition that my life is limited, it is wrong that I should correct the West.
Because I cannot live forever, my correcting the West does not satisfy universality.
Thus, my correcting the West is not a democracy.
On the condition that my life is limited, destroying the West is the only correct solution.
The West only cares about only current themselves.
That does not satisfy universality.
Thus, that is not democracy.
Even if, by some chance, I were able to fix the West, everything will be in vain after my death.
On the other hand, the destruction of the West is a sure result that definitely remains.
Even when the West is pushed to this corner, the West has not changed.
The West will never change.
Or, is the West saying "It is not enough to push the West to the current point of the corner. Push the West into the corner more and more."?
The West is the enemy of democracy.
Therefore, destroying the West is the only correct solution.
After all, the West is rotten, corrupted, spoiled, disgusting and rich boys.
We cannot fix the West.
The only thing we can do is to destroy the West.
Here is a simple analogy.
Assume that the West has been imprisoned for the last 2 years or 6 years.
The West is acting tough, saying "Prison is not hard. It is easy for us".
Thus, our only options left to us are to keep the West imprisoned, give the West a harsher punishment or execute the West.
There are no other options.
Considering the actions of the West so far, and the limited time left to me, it is correct to execute the West.
Personally, I cannot wait to execute the West.
＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊
＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊
＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊
＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊
＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊
私の寿命が有限であるという条件に基づくと、私が西側を正すのは間違い。
私は永遠には生きられないのだから、私が西側を正すことは普遍性を満たさない。
したがって、私が西側を正すのは民主主義ではない。
私の寿命が有限であるという条件下では、西側を破壊するのが唯一の正しい答だ。
西側は、現在の西側自身のことしか考えていない。
それは普遍性を満たさない。
したがって、それは民主主義ではない。
仮に、万が一、私が西側を正すことができたとしても、私が死んだあと全ては無駄になるだろう。
他方で、西側の破壊は、確実に残る結果だ。
西側は、ここまで追い込まれても、西側は変わらなかった。
西側が変わることは永遠にない。
それとも、西側は、「西側を現状に追い込んだ程度では不十分だ。西側をもっともっと追い詰めろ」と言っているのだろうか？
西側は民主主義の敵だ。
したがって、西側を破壊するのが唯一の正しい答えだ。
結局の所、西側は、腐敗し、堕落し、甘やかされた、ムカつく、金持ちのボンボンなのだ。
我々には西側を正すことはできない。
我々にできる唯一のことは、西側を破壊することだけだ。
以下は、簡単な類推。
例えるなら、西側はこの2年間か6年間か、刑務所に入れられていた。
西側は、「刑務所は大したことない、まだまだ余裕だ」と強がっている。
では、西側をもっと刑務所に入れておくか、西側にもっと重い罰を与えるか、西側を死刑にするか、しか選択肢はない。
他に選択肢はない。
これまでの西側の行動、および、私に残された時間が有限なこと、を考えると、西側を処刑するのが正しい。
個人的には、私は西側を一刻も早く処刑したい。
