I have a question.
Is my following idea correct?
* Nuclear-armed strategic bombers are useless today.
* ICBMs (intercontinental ballistic missiles) and SLBMs (submarine-launched ballistic missiles) reach to target within 20 minutes.
Strategic bombers need 3,000-meter class runways.
* You cannot take off all nuclear-armed strategic bombers within 20 minutes.
In order to be useful as a deterrent, 3,000-meter class runways and airplane hangars must endure nuclear attacks.
It is impossible.
* Therefore, nuclear-armed strategic bombers are useless today.
* Then, what is the existence value of stealth nuclear-armed strategic bombers?
Stealth nuclear-armed strategic bombers can be used only for pre‐emptive strikes.
* The U.S. has an evil mind.
The U.S. is the evil empire.
* Stealth nuclear-armed strategic bombers must be prohibited.
＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊
＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊
＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊
＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊
＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊
疑問があります。
以下の私の考えは正しいでしょうか？
* ICBM(大陸間弾道弾)およびSLBM(潜水艦発射弾道弾)は、20分以内に目標に到達する。
戦略爆撃機は、3000メートル級の滑走路が必要だ。
* 全ての核兵器搭載戦略爆撃機を20分以内に離陸させることはできない。
抑止力として役立たせるには、3000メートル級滑走路および格納庫が、核攻撃に耐えられなくてはならない。
それは不可能だ。
* だから、こんにちでは核兵器搭載戦略爆撃機は役に立たない。
* では、核兵器搭載ステルス戦略爆撃機の存在価値は何だろうか？
核兵器搭載ステルス戦略爆撃機は、先制攻撃にのみ使える。
* 米国は、邪悪な考えを持っている。
米国は悪の帝国だ。
