IbrahimLumumbaOmar’s blog

Omar Fanon. Patrice Lumumba.

ウクライナの人々の最大の亡命先はロシア

ウクライナの人々の最大の亡命先はロシア

ウクライナの人々の最大の亡命先はロシア。
ウクライナの人々は、避難先としてロシアを選んでいる。
ウクライナの人々は、西側よりも、ロシアを信頼している。
ウクライナの人々は、ウクライナよりも、ロシアを信頼している。
極限の状況で、ウクライナの人々は、ロシアを最も信頼した。

[国際連合]
ウクライナから避難する人々の状況Ukraine Refugee Situation
https://data.unhcr.org/en/situations/ukraine
* Country
* Dates
* Refugees from Ukraine registered for Temporary Protection or similar national protection schemes
* Refgees from Ukraine recorded in country
* Border crossings from Ukraine
* Border crossings to Ukraine

Countries featured in the Refugee Response Plan

Other Countries neighbouring Ukraine
Refugees from Ukraine recorded in country
Russian Federation 2,197,679

Other European countries


[BBC]4 July
ウクライナから避難する人々の人数と行先は?
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-60555472
Where are refugees going?
The UN says that, as of 4 July, more than 5.2 million refugees from Ukraine have been recorded across Europe. More than 3.5 million have applied for temporary residence in another country:
Russia: (estimated) 1,412,425 Ukrainian refugees recorded
Poland: 1,194,642
Moldova: 82,700
Romania: 83,321
Slovakia: 79,770
Hungary: 25,800
Belarus: 9,820

EU、NATO、西側軍事産業は、ウクライナを食いつくそうとしている。

他国と比較すると、ウクライナは、あまりに過剰に武装されている。

私にはソ連を侮辱するつもりはありません。
ソ連共産主義です。
ソ連では、ソ連を構成する各共和国間で、所得の再配分が行われています。
ウクライナは冷戦時代、最前線でした。
だから、ウクライナソ連時代の武装は理解できます。

もしもウクライナが一人でやっていく気なら、ウクライナは自分で稼がなくてはなりません。
こんにちのウクライナは、その収入に比べ消費し過ぎです。
(I have NO intention to support Zelensky. I love Soviet Union. Both Russia and Ukraine are members of Soviet Union.)

The West and IMF lent Ukraine too much money, and Zelensky spent too much.
As a result, Ukraine is colonized by the West.
The West and IMF know this.
The West and IMF intentionally lent money to Ukraine in order to colonize Ukraine.

The World needs the Gold Standard and Communism.

In short, Soviet Union and Vladimir Lenin are great.

[Wikipedia]
ウクライナ
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraine
人口 • 2021年1月推定 41,167,336
GDP (名目値)    2021年推定 •合計 $198 billion •一人当たり $4,830

[Wikipedia]
フィリピン
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippines
人口 • 2021年推定 109,991,095
GDP (名目値)    2021年推定 •合計 $402.638 billion (32nd) •一人当たり $3,646 (118th)

[Wikipedia]
ウクライナ空軍
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukrainian_Air_Force
3    航空機
3.1    現在の装備
3.1.1    2022年2月現在
航空機        就役中
戦闘用航空機
MiG-29        51
Sukhoi Su-24    12
Sukhoi Su-25    35
Sukhoi Su-27    32

[Wikipedia]
フィリピン空軍の装備
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_equipment_of_the_Philippine_Air_Force
1    航空機
航空機        就役中
戦闘用航空機
KAI T-50    12
OV-10 Bronco    7
Embraer EMB 314    6

 

******************************************************

EUには、加盟国間の所得の再配分は無い。
EUNATO、西側軍事産業は、ウクライナを食いつくそうとしている。

 

 

 

 

国連事務総長は、「アフリカ、中東、イスラム、東南アジア、南アジア、中南米」から選出されるべきだ。

(1)
私は国連総会を信頼しています。

(2)
国連事務総長は、「アフリカ、中東、イスラム、東南アジア、南アジア、中南米」から選出されるべきだ。
国連事務総長は、中立国から選出されるべきだ。

(3)
アントニオグテレスは、ポルトガル出身だ。
ポルトガルNATO加盟国だ。
ポルトガルEU加盟国だ。

(4)
北欧諸国は中立政策を放棄した。
国連事務総長は、北欧諸国から選ばれるべきではない。

(5)
日本は、国連事務総長の中立性を強く要求した。
国連事務総長潘基文」が中国の対日戦勝記念日に参加することを、日本が批判したが、国連事務総長潘基文」は、その批判を拒否した。
日本は「国連は歴史的イベントにおいて中立であるべき」と主張し「強い不満を表明した」。潘基文はその話は認識している、と回答した。
Ban’s office said he was aware of concern in Japan, which believes the UN should remain neutral on the commemoration of historical events and has voiced “strong displeasure” over his attendance in a message sent through it mission to the UN.

第2次大戦中に、ファシストに抵抗して戦った戦いの中での、中国の「貢献と犠牲」を認識することになる、

 

[Wikipedia]
António Guterres
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ant%C3%B3nio_Guterres
António Manuel de Oliveira Guterres (born 30 April 1949) is a Portuguese politician and diplomat.

[Wikipedia]
Secretary-General of the United Nations
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secretary-General_of_the_United_Nations
4    List of secretaries-genera
1 Trygve Lie / 2 February 1946 – 10 November 1952 / Norway
2 Dag Hammarskjöld / 10 April 1953 – 18 September 1961 / Sweden
- U Thant / Acting 3 November 1961 – 30 November 1962 / Burma
3 U Thant / 30 November 1962 – 31 December 1971 / Burma
4 Kurt Waldheim / 1 January 1972 – 31 December 1981 / Austria
5 Javier Pérez de Cuéllar  / 1 January 1982 – 31 December 1991 / Peru
6 Boutros Boutros-Ghali  / 1 January 1992 – 31 December 1996 / Egypt
7 Kofi Annan / 1 January 1997 – 31 December 2006 / Ghana
8 Ban Ki-moon / 1 January 2007 – 31 December 2016 / South Korea
9 António Guterres / 1 January 2017 – present / Portugal

[Wikipedia]
Enlargement of NATO
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enlargement_of_NATO
1    Past enlargements
1.1    Cold War
Twelve countries were part of the founding of NATO: Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

[Wikipedia]
Member state of the European Union
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Member_state_of_the_European_Union
1    List
List of European Union member states
Name / Accession
Portugal / 1986

[Gurdian]Mon 31 Aug 2015 
Ban Ki-moon rejects Japanese criticism of him attending China's Victory Day
The UN secretary general says it is important to recognise China’s ‘contribution and sacrifice’ in the fight against fascism in second world war
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/aug/31/ban-ki-moon-rejects-japanese-criticism-of-him-attending-chinas-victory-day
中国の対日戦勝記念日は、中国の戦時中の犠牲を認識し、
The UN secretary general, Ban Ki-moon, has rejected Japanese criticism of his decision to attend China’s Victory Day parade later this week, saying it was important to recognise China’s wartime sacrifice and learn the lessons of history.
Ban, who will be among about 30 world leaders attending a spectacular military parade in Beijing on Thursday, told Chinese media his presence would be in recognition of China’s “contribution and sacrifice” in the fight against fascism during the second world war.
第2次大戦中に、ファシストに抵抗して戦った戦いの中での、中国の「貢献と犠牲」を認識することになる、
Ban’s office said he was aware of concern in Japan, which believes the UN should remain neutral on the commemoration of historical events and has voiced “strong displeasure” over his attendance in a message sent through it mission to the UN.

 


[Wikipedia]
国連事務総長選出
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Secretary-General_selection
United Nations Secretary-General selection is the process of selecting the next secretary-general of the United Nations.
To be selected as secretary-general, a candidate must receive the votes of at least nine members of the United Nations Security Council, with no vetoes from permanent members. The secretary-general is then appointed by a majority vote of the United Nations General Assembly.
3    Qualifications for office
The qualifications for holding the office have never been set down formally. However, some qualifications have been established through precedent and are supported by the veto power of China and France.
The United States and the United Kingdom do not accept the Sino-French qualifications and have supported candidates who do not meet the requirements.
3.1    Term limit
The office is subject to a term limit of two full terms.
U Thant served three terms, but his first two terms were partial terms that added up to one full term.
In 1981, China cast 16 vetoes against Kurt Waldheim’s selection for a third term, and Waldheim eventually suspended his candidacy.
Since 1981, no secretary-general has attempted to run for a third term.
3.2    Regional rotation
The office of secretary-general is rotated among the regional groups of the UN. Each region gets two or three consecutive terms as secretary-general.
Candidates from that region are then disqualified in the next selection, and a new region gets its turn at the office.

* 1976年、中国は、西欧のKurt Waldheimの国連事務総長選手地に対し、形式的に拒否権を行使した。
* 1981年に、中国は、アフリカの候補者を支持した。そして、Kurt Waldheimが立候補を断念するまで16回拒否権を行使した。安全保障理事会はこの状況を打開するために、中南米の候補者を選出した。
* In 1991, the United States and United Kingdom attempted to open the selection to a candidate from any region, but China and France declared their support for an African candidate.
* In 1996, the French Ambassador stated that the next secretary-general "will be from Africa."
Attempts to nominate a candidate from another region were dismissed by diplomats who believed that China would veto any non-African candidate.
* In 2006, China declared that the next secretary-general should be Asian and voted for all the Asian candidates.


[Wikipedia]
国連事務総長
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secretary-General_of_the_United_Nations
1    選出と任期
最大で2期の制限がある。これは中国が作ったルールだ。1981年の選出において、Kurt Waldheimの3期目の選出に対し、中国は16回拒否権を行使した。

 

 

全ての西側諸国は、ウクライナの農地から手を引け。

またもや西側は嘘をついている。
西側は、ウクライナプランテーションオーナーになろうとしているのだ。
全ての西側諸国は、ウクライナの農地から手を引け。
西側は今すぐ死ぬべきだ。
西側は、帝国主義者で、植民地主義者でファシストだ。

西側は、アフリカの飢饉を悪用し小麦を売ろうとしている。なぜなら、西側はウクライナの農地の所有者だから。

Zelenskiy wants Ukraine’s parliament by the end of the year to pass legislation on lifting the ban on land sales.
In the face of the opposition from farmers, he has agreed that only Ukrainians should be allowed to buy farmland for the first few years.
The loophole is that this would include foreign-owned companies that have been working in Ukraine for more than three years.

Among them is AgroGeneration, a French-based publicly traded company that is majority owned by U.S. investors and whose CEO is an American, John Shmorhun.
He says the company farms about 55,000 hectares leased from about 15,000 individual owners in the Kharkiv region of eastern Ukraine, producing sunflowers, soybeans, corn and wheat. He has a team of people who manage the lease agreements, which by law run for a minimum of seven years, although often much longer.

[AP]October 31, 2019
ウクライナが農地を売却しようとしていることは、外国に恐怖を呼び起こしている。
Ukraine’s plan to sell farmland raises fears of foreigners
https://apnews.com/article/business-china-russia-europe-international-news-485c96d4fc5e49378b101eb0f0c4b051
Most of Ukraine’s rich farmland is carved up into small plots owned by about 7 million people, like Tetiana Petrovych, the postmistress in this village west of the capital. They own the land but can’t sell it.
Ukraine, which is one of the top grain exporters in the world and recently overtook the U.S. as the leading exporter of corn to China, forbids the sale of agricultural land.
This seems about to change.
Ukraine’s new president wants to open the land market, a step long pushed by economists and international financial institutions to stimulate investment in an agricultural sector with much untapped potential.
Not everyone is happy, though.

President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and his government have given assurances that Ukrainians will have preference in buying land, but there are potential loopholes and the fears persist.

ウクライナソ連の一部だった時、農業は集団化されており、すべての農地は国の所有だった。
After the Soviet breakup in 1991, those who worked on the farms were given shares of the land, although it took years to formalize.
There was then a brief period when land sales were permitted, but a moratorium was imposed in 2001 until a legal framework could be created to regulate the market.
It has never been lifted.

ゼレンスキーは、ウクライナ議会に対し、この年の終わりまでに「"土地売却禁止"を廃止する法律」を通すように望んだ。
農家の反対にあったとき、ゼレンスキーは、「最初の数年間は、ウクライナ人のみが農地を買えるようにする」と約束した。
しかしこの法律には抜け穴があり、ウクライナで3年以上活動している外資系企業もウクライナの農地を買うことが可能なのだ。

フランスの企業AgroGenerationなどがウクライナの農地を買おうとしている。AgroGenerationは、米投資家が所有し、CEOは米国人John Shmorhunだ。
He says the company farms about 55,000 hectares leased from about 15,000 individual owners in the Kharkiv region of eastern Ukraine, producing sunflowers, soybeans, corn and wheat. He has a team of people who manage the lease agreements, which by law run for a minimum of seven years, although often much longer.

Most small landowners lease their plots so they can be farmed more efficiently.
That’s the case with Petrovych and others in Nebelytsia, a village of several hundred people.
She and her daughter own plots of two hectares (five acres) each, which they lease to Serhii Halusyn, who farms the cornfields that stretch out from the village.
“Thanks to Halusyn, our lands don’t choke with weeds and I have corn,” Petrovych said. 
Instead of cash, she takes her yearly payment in corn and uses it to feed her cow.
And because she has milk and cottage cheese to share with her neighbors, they give her carrots, beets and pumpkins from their gardens.
Petrovych, 61, earns a little money by delivering the village mail on her bicycle.
On a recent Saturday, her pouch was stuffed with electricity bills and an envelope of cash for a woman who receives her alimony through the post office.
She also delivers monthly pensions of about $80 to more than 40 elderly villagers.
She has no interest in selling her land, hoping some of her 10 grandchildren will one day want to live in the village, about a 90-minute drive from Kyiv. She also opposes allowing land sales in general, a view widely shared in the village.
“If foreigners come, they will take away our only possibility to work,” Viktor Romaniuk, 52, said as he drove a combine harvesting the last of this year’s corn crop. 
“They will give us only a little money and crush small- and medium-sized business. I’m against the sale of land.”

 

**************************************************************


[abc News]October 31, 2019
Ukraine's plan to sell farmland raises fears of foreigners
https://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/ukraines-plan-sell-farmland-raises-fears-foreigners-66658980
Plans by the new Ukrainian government to lift the ban on sales of farmland are stirring fears that Ukraine's coveted black earth will be bought up by foreigners, including Russians

 

**************************************************************

 

Zelenskiy is only a dog of the West.
Zelenskiy has been making "Ukrainian people" "peasants of the West."
Ukrainian people must rise against Zelenskiy immediately.

 


**************************************************************

 

ルーマニアは既に西側に植民地化されている。
"However, if things progress in a similar way to neighboring Romania, foreign control of this land could transpire."
"Romania has a similar story of dissolving collectivized farms, giving land titles to collective farm workers, and imposing a moratorium on the sale of agricultural land. Loopholes in the country’s national legislation have created opportunities for foreign control of land via bankruptcy proceedings."
"As documented by Judith Bouniol(link is external), the bankruptcy of national agribusinesses has provided a gateway for foreign control of Romania’s farmland."


[Oakland Institute]May 8, 2015
Who Owns Agricultural Land in Ukraine?
https://www.oaklandinstitute.org/blog/who-owns-agricultural-land-ukraine
The fate of Ukraine’s agricultural sector is on shaky ground.
Last year, the Oakland Institute reported that over 1.6 million hectares (ha) of land in Ukraine are now under the control of foreign-based corporations. Further research has allowed for the identification of additional foreign investments.
Some estimates now bring the total of Ukrainian farmland controlled by foreign companies to over 2.2 million ha;1 however, research has also identified important grey areas around land tenure in the country, and who actually controls land in Ukraine today is difficult to ascertain.

The companies and shareholders behind foreign land acquisitions in Ukraine span many different parts of the world.
The Danish "Trigon Agri," for example, holds over 52,000 ha(link is external).
Trigon was established in 2006 using start-up capital from Finnish "high net worth individuals(link is external)." 
The company is traded in Stockholm (NASDAQ), and its largest shareholders include(link is external): JPM Chase (UK, 9.5 percent); Swedbank (Sweden, 9.4 percent); UB Securities (Finland, 7.9 percent); Euroclear Bank (Belgium, 6.6 percent); and JP Morgan Clearing Corp (USA, 6.2 percent).

The United Farmers Holding Company(link is external), which is owned by a group of Saudi Arabian investors, controls some 33,000 ha(link is external) of Ukrainian farmland through Continental Farmers Group PLC.

AgroGeneration, which holds 120,000 ha(link is external) of Ukrainian farmland, is incorporated in France, with over 62 percent(link is external) of its shares managed by SigmaBleyzer(link is external), a Texas-based investment company.

US pension fund NCH Capital holds 450,000 ha(link is external).
The company began in 1993 and boasts being some of the earliest western investors(link is external) in Ukraine after the break-up of the Soviet Union. Over the past decade, the company has systematically leased out small parcels of agricultural land (around two to six hectares in size) across Ukraine, aggregating these into large-scale farms that now operate industrially.
According to NCH Capital’s General Partner, George Rohr(link is external), the leases give the company the right to buy the currently-leased farmland once the moratorium on the sale of land in Ukraine is lifted.

Another subset of companies have Ukrainian leadership, often a mix of domestic and foreign investment, and may be incorporated in tax havens like Cyprus, Austria, and Luxembourg.
Some of them are also led by Ukrainian oligarchs. For instance, UkrLandFarming(link is external) controls the country's largest land-bank, totalling 654,000 ha of land. 95 percent(link is external) of the shares of UkrLandFarming are owned by multi-millionaire Oleg Bakhmatyuk with the remaining five percent having been recently sold to Cargill.
Similarly, Yuriy Kosiuk, Ukraine's fifth richest man(link is external), is the CEO of MHP, one of the country's largest agricultural companies, which holds over 360,000 ha(link is external) of farmland.

With the onset of the political crisis, several of these mostly Ukrainian-based companies have descended into crisis themselves.
One example is Cyprus-incorporated Mriya Agro Holding, which holds a land-bank of close to 300,000 ha.
In 2014, the company’s website (which is no longer available online) indicated that 80 percent of the shares of Mriya Agro Holding are/were owned by the Guta family (Ukrainian), who hold primary leadership positions in the company.
The remaining 20 percent are/were listed on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange.

According to news sources, in summer 2014 the company defaulted on its payments(link is external) for two large Eurobonds, putting its future into question. The company first enlisted the support of US-based Blackstone Group(link is external) and Ukrainian-based Dragon Capital, both of whom withdrew support after only one month; and later, the international auditing and financial service firm, Deloitte(link is external).
An international bondholder committee(link is external) was struck, comprised of several US and UK-based investment groups (including CarVal Investors(link is external) – Cargill’s investment arm), which together own over 50 percent of the debt owed on Mriya’s 2018 Eurobonds and 15 percent of the 2016 Eurobonds. The future of this firm is unclear with some sources suggesting(link is external) a risk of bankruptcy. 

Other Ukrainian-owned companies incorporated in tax havens are also experiencing difficulties. Sintal Agriculture Public Ltd (based in Cyprus, traded on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange as of 2008, and holding almost 150,000 ha of land) ceased trading in shares on January 29, 2014 "until further notice(link is external)" after bankruptcy proceedings(link is external) were initiated against the company.
In 2013, its website (now also defunct) indicated that 36.3 percent of the company was free floating shares.

The potential bankruptcy of these corporations, and the involvement of Western investors in the crisis management, raises questions about the fate of the agricultural land they hold.
At this time, it is not clear how control over the agricultural lands in question will be addressed and what the role of foreign companies and funds who have invested in these companies will be.
However, if things progress in a similar way to neighboring Romania, foreign control of this land could transpire.

Romania has a similar story of dissolving collectivized farms, giving land titles to collective farm workers, and imposing a moratorium on the sale of agricultural land. Loopholes in the country’s national legislation have created opportunities for foreign control of land via bankruptcy proceedings.
As documented by Judith Bouniol(link is external), the bankruptcy of national agribusinesses has provided a gateway for foreign control of Romania’s farmland.

It is far from clear if the same scenario could take place in Ukraine.
However, this lesson from Romania emphasizes the importance of keeping close watch on these agricultural land deals.
In addition, the murky situation around land ownership in Ukraine raises many questions. Perhaps the most important is whether the growing concentration of Ukrainian land in the hands of a few oligarchs and foreign corporations can benefit the country, its people, and its economy.

 

 

**************************************************************

 


[Australian National Review]May 27, 2022
3つの米巨大多国籍企業が、ウクライナの農地1700万ヘクタールを買収
Three Large American Multinationals Bought 17 Million Hectares of Ukrainian Agricultural Land
https://www.australiannationalreview.com/lifestyle/three-large-american-multinationals-bought-17-million-hectares-of-ukrainian-agricultural-land/
These are Cargill, Dupont and Monsanto (which is officially German-Australian but with American capital).
Five percent of Ukrainian agricultural land was subsequently purchased by the Chinese state. For comparison, the whole of Italy has 16.7 million hectares of agricultural land.
In short, three American companies bought more useful agricultural land in Ukraine than the whole of Italy.
Among the main shareholders of these three companies are Vanguard, Blackrock, Blackstone.

The usual suspects again…

https://www.ritimo.org/A-qui-profite-vraiment-la-creation-d-un-marche-des-terres-en-Ukraine

Editor’s note:
The 17 million hectares quoted was an error and its 1.7 million. Note the alleged companies don’t hold the land in their names but via investment funds.
著者注:
1700万ヘクタールは170万ヘクタールの間違い。
 

 


**************************************************************

 


In the year following the reform, three international consortia with American capital became the largest buyers in Ukraine.
The Australian National Journal wrote that these three multinationals purchased a total of 17 million hectares of farmland, which represented 28 percent of arable land, or nearly a third.
The three giants are Cargill, DuPont and Monsanto.
“The Ukrainian puppet government allowed three American companies to buy more agricultural land than there is in all of Italy.”

[CampusLately]July 30, 2022
AMERICAN GIANTS BUY UKRAINIAN FARMLAND
https://www.campuslately.com/american-giants-buy-ukrainian-farmland/
55% of the total area of ​​Ukraine is arable land. It is not just a species: fertile soils rich in fats are of enormous agricultural value.
But for a long time, it could only be rented.
In 2001, the Ukrainian government adopted a moratorium on the sale and purchase of land, which was subsequently extended ten times.
Farmers who had only a small area of ​​land, the cultivation of which was not profitable, preferred to rent the area. Thus the small estates came under the influence of the large agricultural corporations, who used valuable black soil for a pittance.

A change occurred on July 1, 2021, when the previous moratorium was lifted under pressure from the Washington-based International Monetary Fund (IMF), and thus the possibility of buying and selling land became available again. Zelensky’s government began land privatization and enabled economic actors outside Ukraine to purchase agricultural land. Prices quickly jumped from $2,500 to $10,000 per hectare, which is still very good considering the high quality of the land.

In the year following the reform, three international consortia with American capital became the largest buyers in Ukraine.
The Australian National Journal wrote that these three multinationals purchased a total of 17 million hectares of farmland, which represented 28 percent of arable land, or nearly a third. The three giants are Cargill, DuPont and Monsanto.
The portal article states,
“The Ukrainian puppet government allowed three American companies to buy more agricultural land than there is in all of Italy.”
They also declared that Ukrainian lands no longer belong to Ukrainians.
However, President Volodymyr Zelensky himself previously described the unlimited acquisition of land by the Chinese, Arabs, or “unidentified flying objects” with horror stories.

The United States is not the first to set its sights on Ukrainian agricultural land.
According to an earlier article in the Wall Street Journal, as early as 2013, China signed a half-century lease agreement for nine percent of Ukraine’s best agricultural land, which represents five percent of the country’s total area.

Giorgi Soros has already proven how good it is to buy farmland.

“I am convinced that arable land is one of the best investments of our time,” said the Hungarian-American businessman, who himself bought vast tracts in the past, and many speculators followed suit.

By the way, the role of Ukrainian agricultural land is also decisive from the point of view of world food, since Ukraine is one of the most important agricultural exporters: 16 percent of the world’s corn and 12 percent of wheat come from here.

 

**************************************************************

 

 

[Wikipedia]
アメリカに死をDeath to America」
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_to_America
アメリカに死をDeath to America」は、「反米政治スローガン」及び「反米政治スローガンを唱えるときの言葉」。
イラン、アフガニスタンレバノン、イエメン、イラクパキスタンで用いられている。
イランでは、1979年イラン革命開始時から用いられている。
イランイスラム共和国の第1代最高指導者であるローホーラ・ホメイニ師がこの言葉を広めた。

**************************************************************

Death to America.
Death to the West.

植民地の定義とは何か?

植民地の定義とは何か?


植民地の定義とは何か?
(1) 植民地は、安価に天然資源を供出させられる。
(2) 植民地の通貨は安く抑えられている。
(3) 植民地は、宗主国の製品を強制的に交わされる。
(4) 植民地は、重工業及び先進技術を保有することを禁じられる。
(5) 植民地は、植民地の商品の輸出を禁じられる。

つまり。
西側諸国は、アフリカ、中東、東南アジア、南アジア、中南米、東欧を植民地にしている。
西側諸国は、帝国主義者ファシスト植民地主義者だ。

全世界は、反西側で決起すべきだ。
原油価格を上昇させよう。
天然ガス価格を上昇させよう。

「西側が完全に破壊され、西側が全面的に破壊されること」、こそが、唯一の平和的解決法だ。

解決策は、石油ショックしかない。
我々にはもう一度、「1973年石油ショック」が必要だ。
1973年石油ショックにおいては、OAPECは「米国およびその他の国が今回の紛争においてイスラエルを支持するなら、米国およびその他の国に対する石油輸出を制限あるいは停止する」と宣言した。

もちろん、我々は、この機会を利用し、独立を得るために戦う。
もちろん、こんにち、「G7、NATO、西側諸国、EU、米国」は、悪だ。
「アフリカ、中東、イスラム、南アジア、東南アジア、中南米「は、「G7、NATO、西側諸国、EU、米国」の邪悪な行いにより、被害を被ってきた。

仮に核戦争が起きたとしても、核戦争後の世界は、今よりは良い世界だろう。

仮に核戦争が起きたとしても、核戦争後の世界は、今よりは良い世界だろう。

 

仮に核戦争が起きたとしても、アフリカ、中東、イスラム圏、南アジア、東南アジア、中南米は生き残る。
そして、おそらくは、核戦争後の世界は、今よりは良い世界だろう。
全ての西側諸国が絶滅した世界を想像してごらん。Imagine, all the West die.
それも一つの答えだ。
私は、アフリカ系イスラム教徒になりたい。

 

The U.S. cannot borrow money.

またもや西側のマスコミは嘘をついている。
世界は誰も米国を信用していない。
米国は金を借りることができない。

市場においては、金利も「需要と供給」で決定される。
人々が国債を売れば、国債価格は下がる。
人々が国債を買えば、国債価格は上がる。

 

I will explain the simplest case.
(1)
Bonds has only "Maturity Price."
At Maturity, the government pays the "Maturity Price" to the holder.
"Current Market price" and "Maturity Price" decides "Spot Rate."
For example, "Maturity Price" is 110 and "Current Market price" is 100, then Spot Rate is 10%. (We assume that 1 year is left to Maturity date.)
(110 - 100) / 100 = 10%

(2)
政府は、満期を迎えた国債を借り換えるために、定期的に新規国債を発行する。

(3)
しかし誰も政府を信用していなければ、政府はより高い金利国債を発行しないといけない(満期価格が高くなる)。

My explanation above is correct? Someone, please teach me.

[NextAdvisor]July 13, 2022 

米国のシリーズI国債は、史上初めて9%の利回りで売り出された。どうやってインフレをヘッジするか。
Series I Bonds Top 9% for the First Time Ever. Here’s How You Can Use Them as a Hedge Against Inflation
https://time.com/nextadvisor/banking/savings/series-i-savings-bonds/
Savings bonds are as old-school a money tool as you’ll find, but one type in particular is having a real moment, with a historic rise to a 9.62% annual rate.
The Treasury Department announced the new rate on May 2, which is active through October this year.
The stock market is stumbling, and the recent 40-year high wave of inflation, which was 9.1% in June, an inflation-protected Series I savings bonds have drawn new interest from savers and investors.

 

 

*************************************************************

誰が「悪の親玉」か?

日本の国債は、額面の利回りは0.05%である。(日本政府が0.05%で売り出した)。
ドイツの国債の利回りは、0%以下である。

[Ministry of Japan (in Japanese Language)]
https://www.mof.go.jp/jgbs/individual/kojinmuke/main/outline/

[Wall Street Journal]Aug. 2, 2019 
Germany’s Longest Bond Goes Negative for First Time
Rates on 30-year bunds dip briefly to minus 0.002% as investors seek haven assets
https://www.wsj.com/articles/germanys-longest-bond-goes-negative-for-first-time-11564751881
Investors spooked by a revival of trade tensions piled into safe assets on Friday, pushing 30-year German government yields into negative territory for the first time.

[Reuters]OCTOBER 18, 2019
Who is buying negative-yielding German bonds? Foreign central banks, perhaps
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-bonds-centralbanks-analysis-idUSKBN1WX0JN
German government bonds with their sub-zero yields have lured foreign inflows for four straight months.
Talk is that it’s reserve managers from Switzerland and China who are among those paying to lend money to Berlin.
Germany’s 10-year sovereign bond has traded with yields below 0% for the most part since March.

 

 

*************************************************************

 

途上国は、先進国により、国債市場においても搾取されている。
途上国は金を借りれない。
途上国は金を借りれたとしても、非常に高い利率である。

We need Communism and Socialism all over the world.

First of all, Communism will not lend money.
Communism countries trade in Barter System.
Accumulating capital (accumulation of capital) and/or Taking interest by lending money are NEVER communism.
Communists NEVER accumulate capital NOR take interest by lending money.

 

 

 

 

「信用格付機関」は米国により独占されている。
我々には、西側及びG7から独立を果たすことが必要だ。
ブラック・ライブズ・マター。Black Lives Matter.

[アフリカ連合African Union]July 20, 2022
PRESS RELEASES
ガーナは、アフリカ信用格付機関の設立を支援する。
https://au.int/en/pressreleases/20220720/ghana-supports-establishment-african-credit-rating-agency
The APRM delegation, led by Dr. Abdoulie Janneh, who is the Vice Chair of the APR Panel of Eminent Persons and Prof. Eddy Maloka, the Chief Executive Officer of APRM Continental Secretariat, met with the Vice-President of Ghana, Hon. Mahamudu Bawumia during their official visit to Ghana.
Ghana reaffirmed its support to the establishment of an African Credit Rating Agency.
ガーナは既に、3つのアフリカ連合金融機関設立を支持している。「アフリカ投資銀行African Investment Bank (AIB)」、「アフリカ金融基金African Monetary Fund (AMF)」、「アフリカ中央銀行African Central Bank (ACB)」である。


[Wikipedia]
信用格付機関
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credit_rating_agency
A credit rating agency (CRA, also called a ratings service) is a company that assigns credit ratings, which rate a debtor's ability to pay back debt by making timely principal and interest payments and the likelihood of default.
An agency may rate the creditworthiness of issuers of debt obligations, of debt instruments, and in some cases, of the servicers of the underlying debt, but not of individual consumers.
The debt instruments rated by CRAs include government bonds, corporate bonds, CDs, municipal bonds, preferred stock, and collateralized securities, such as mortgage-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations.
信用格付機関は、過度に寡占が進んでいる業界であり、ビッグ3と呼ばれる信用格付機関が、ビジネスの95%を支配している。
「Moody's Investors Serviceムーディーズ」「Standard & Poor's (S&P)スタンダードプアーズ」 で世界市場の80%を支配し、フィッチがさらに15%を支配している。


[Wikipedia]
Moody's Investors Serviceムーディーズ
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moody%27s_Investors_Service
本社: 世界貿易センター、ニューヨーク、米国

[Wikipedia]
S&P Global Ratingsスタンダードプアーズ
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%26P_Global_Ratings
本社:    ニューヨーク、米国

[Wikipedia]
Fitch Ratingsフィッチ
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fitch_Ratings
本社:    ニューヨーク、米国

 

 

オイルダラーにはもっと力がある。
だから、産油国はドルを嫌う。
なぜなら、米国はドルの価値を低下させ続けているから。
つまり、米国は、産油国の貯蓄の価値を低下させ続けている。
そして、それこそが、米国が、イラクリビア、シリアを侵略した理由だ。
つまり、天然資源が豊かな国々は、決して西側とは平和的に共存できないのだ。
しかし、産油国は、米国を平和的に破壊することが可能だ

[Investopia]
「オイルダラーPetrodollars」
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/petrodollars.asp
「オイルダラーPetrodollars」の理解。
世界の原油輸出量は、2020年には、1日当たり、平均して、8840万バレルである。
このペースは、原油価格が1バレル当たり100ドルだと仮定すると、1年で3.2兆ドル以上のオイルダラーを生み出すことになる。